Reviews for Download All Images
Download All Images by Joe Ertaba
Review by Firefox user 14739548
Rated 1 out of 5
by Firefox user 14739548, 3 years agoDoes the job but it is way too demanding. I want a one-click solution. "Download all images" and that's all I want to say about it.
With this version it takes FIVE clicks to perform the save and two of those clicks involve wait time of several seconds.
The defaults are acceptable. An option to display the path to the saved zip would be useful for some, but once you've run this a few times you know exactly where to look.
I'd give this two stars because I like the zip but I so dislike the chatty nature that I'm going with mean.
I continue to look for a similar app with a less onerous UI.
With this version it takes FIVE clicks to perform the save and two of those clicks involve wait time of several seconds.
The defaults are acceptable. An option to display the path to the saved zip would be useful for some, but once you've run this a few times you know exactly where to look.
I'd give this two stars because I like the zip but I so dislike the chatty nature that I'm going with mean.
I continue to look for a similar app with a less onerous UI.
650 reviews
- Rated 2 out of 5by Weirdnez, 4 days agoFLAKY - randomly different results every time for the same basic operation (images all in the one directory indexed xxx01 xxx02 etc). I skim-counted ~200 images, it finds 5 of them. I had set 200px image min. It found 20px images. I then set jp(e)g only, and it finds very few. Results VARY each time (semi-) randomly. Hung the browser BADLY (100% CPU & 1GB RAM used according to about:processes - which I have plenty more than). This was when it DID warn about "too slow" a setting. Without that it wasn't finding images, so it's no good either way. I don't have TIME to work out yet another confusing default settings UI! Or just a generally-confusing UI, even if defaults need to be tweaked (and I am very much into RTFM as what else is going to work?). This needs to be user-friendly in the sense of settings do what they APPEAR to do! NOTE: I am using Tor Browser set to MEDIUM security. Apologies if this is breaking the specific site functionality and this extension's behaviour is simply symptomatic of that. It is a war on privacy we're living through, be sure of that. Sites refuse to work in basic ways any more, citing bots or content-scrapers. This is when they're pirating the content in effect, themselves! Stupid humans...
- Rated 1 out of 5by Floch Forster, 25 days agoDidn't recognise all images on a NovelCrow page, now I need another extension to download that certain comic to see these two lovebirds in all of their glory.
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 19947912, a month agoРасширение отлично работает с браузером mozilla
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 15997101, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by SilverAmd, 2 months ago
- Rated 4 out of 5by NGOY Constantin, 3 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 13771040, 3 months agoI have used this extension for a long time, but nowadays it always produces a ZIP-file that seems to be invalid.
- Rated 1 out of 5by GPRaccount, 4 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Mastix, 4 months agoZip Files always empty or windows cannot open them. It would be much better without zip.
- Rated 5 out of 5by Rosalinda, 4 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 17368533, 4 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by 12, 4 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Joy Cuspide, 4 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 19768603, 4 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by swamynath, 4 months ago
- Rated 3 out of 5by MonosodiumGlutamate, 4 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by elsenfox, 5 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Munenushi, 5 months agoWorks great - configurable, seems to handle any embedded graphics. Wonderfully done
- Rated 5 out of 5by Fladrif, 5 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Dzluck, 7 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 19557178, 8 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Ugarov, 8 months ago